Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

IWANSITINDAON: Business Practices

IWANSITINDAON: Business Practices: "Business Practices With the growing complexcity of industrial structural and the need for achieving economies of scale for ensuring higher..."

Monday, June 28, 2010

Social Problem

Nowadays the juvenile delinquency especially fighting interschool is increase. These matters are subjected to most comprehensive and elaborate formal regime, which is inspired by the dual considerations, often contradictory, of controlling the troublesome sections of the child population and securing justice to them soure of studies relating to delinquency confirms. The finding that “delinquency is not a social problem either in a behavioural on societal-reaction sense what has been demonstrated is the persisting and enduring positive influence of the family and culture in providing the cohesion and solidarity necessary for the prevention, control and treatment of juvenile social maladjustment inspite of the negative influence of poverty, over crowding, unemployment and urbanization”, favour a clear and decisive movement for a non-institutionalised approach to the problems.


Friday, June 25, 2010

Business Practices

Business Practices


With the growing complexcity of industrial structural and the need for achieving economies of scale for ensuring higher productivity and competitive advantage in the international market, the thrust of industrial policy has shifted to controlling and regulating the monopolistic, restrictive, and unfair trade practices rather than making at necessary for the certain undertaking to oftain prior approval of the Central Government for expansion, esthabishment of new undertakings, merger, amalgamation, take over and appointment of directors.

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Environmental

Environmental


For developed countries especially, environmental issue at the beginning contitus a dillematic things due to the economic growing which it have to be done for the sake of prosperity acceleration. In its subsequent development, the prinsip of persepective environmental development is accepted as doctrine, but in its implementation is not seemingly engaging seriouslybby the indicator of domination of economical growing policy if it is compared with environmental matters.

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

IWANSITINDAON: Globalization

IWANSITINDAON: Globalization: "Globalization only heihtens public anxiety over corporate conduct. Many people seem to think that corporate virtue declines as internationa..."

Globalization


Globalization only heihtens public anxiety over corporate conduct. Many people seem to think that corporate virtue declines as international economic activity expands. An analysis using the virtue matrix suggests that the source of the skepticism has to do with the variations among the civil foundations of countries at differing stages of economic and political development.

A country’s civil foundation- thus its supply of corporate virtue - tends to grow in concert with its overall economic development. In general, corporate social responsibility in economically advanced countries is generated by deep, solid civil foundations supporting relatively smaller strategic and structural frontiers. The civil foundations of countries with developing economies, by contrast, are relatively shallow and weak, and their strategic and structural frontiers are correspondingly large. (This is a function of limited economic capacity, not necessarily a lack of desire to do good. In a country whose annual per capita GDP is $500, compared with $35,000 per capita in the United States, providing medical benefits to same-sex partners is not a pressing corporate issue. Making sure that companies don’t sicken or exhaust their workers is.)

The varying depths of the world’s civil foundations can affect the global supply of corporate responsibility both positively and negatively. On the positive side, globalizing corporations from advanced countries can enter developing economies and bring with them the employment and environmental practices of their home countries civil foundation. Those some practices are likely to be in the strategic or structural frontiers of the host country’s virtue matrix. In adopting those practices, local businesses engage in responsible behavior that eventually migrates to their country;s civil foundation. In this way, globalization can “average up” the world’s civil foundations.

What can be averaged up, however, can also be “averaged down.” When a corporation from an advanced economy does business in a developing country, it may instead establish a level of corporate virtue consistent with the host country’s civil foundation. Notoriously, Nike, by running its Southeast Asian athletic footwear plants and paying its workers in accordance with local customs and practices, opened itself to charges of operating sweatshops. In essence, it was accused of averaging down its level of corporate responsibility. Although the company protested that its conduct was virtuous by local standards, angry U.S. consumers made it clear that they expected Nike to conform to the U.S. civil foundation, even if doing so meant the company had to operate in the strategic or structural frontier of its Southeast Aiean hosts.

Practices in developing countries can also average down the civil foundation of an advanced country. For example, American garment manufacturers have argued that competitive pressure from manufacturers in developing countries, where wages are low and benefits nonexistent, make it impossible to maintain benefits for their U.S. level benefits packages have migrated from the civil foundation to the structural frontier as a result of foreign competition.

The net impact of globalization on the supply of responsible corporate behavior has yet to be calculated, of course. But it’s apparent that companies from countries with robust civil foundations will determine the outcome. If their practices average up civil foundations worldwide, globalization advocates will be vindicated in their belief that increased internastional economic activity can address some of the world’s most difficult development problems. On the other hand, acorporate race to the bottom would succeed inly in averaging down civil foundations and confirming the most lurid fears of globalization opponents.

Doing Good By Doing Well


Doing Good By Doing Well

My team of researchers and I have found a number of companies that are breaking the mold-they are moving beyond corporate social responsibility to corporate social innovation. These companies are the vanguard of the new paradigm. They view community needs as opportunities to develop ideas and demonstrate business technologies, to find and serve now markets, and to solve long-standing business problems. They focus their efforts on inventing sophisticated solutions through a hands-on approach.

Tackling social sector problems forces companies to stretch their capabilities to produce innovations that have business as well as community payoffs. When companies approach social needs in this way, they have a stake in the problems, and they treat the effort the way they would treat any other project central to the company’s operations. They use their best people and their core skills. This is not charity; it is R&D-astrategic business investment. Let’s look at a few examples from the fields of education, welfare programs, and inner-city development.

Making Partnerships Work


Making Partnerships Work

Making the new paradigm work isn’t easy. In contrast to typical business-to-business relationships. There is an added layer of complexity. Government and nonprofit organizations are drivern by goals other than profitability, and they may even be suspicious of business motivations. Additionally, the institutional infrastructure of the social sector is undeveloped in business terms. For that reason, punlic schools and inner cities can be said to resemble emerging markets. Those difficulties, however, can be overcome. My research has identified six characteristics of successful private-public partnerships; a clear business agenda, strong partners commited to change, investment by both parties, rootedness in the user community, links to other community organizations, and a long-term commitment to sustain and replicate the results.